image of ancient cross



……. Though they were aware of an “ unknown God” due to their plagiarizing of Moses and Prophets such as Jeremiah and Ezekiel, as well as the prophecy of Balaam, none of the Philosophers and wise men of the heathen “ gave Him credit or glory”, as the Apostle Paul in Romans confirms. “ ALL the gods of the nations are demons” is a literal fact which both St Paul and King David adumbrate in no uncertain terms. Though the Philosophers have stolen much from Moses and the Prophets, they were never regarded as proto-Christians or proto-believers but, according to Irenaeus and Hippolytus, they were ALL ( without exception) the originals of all subsequent error and heresy in and out of the Church.
No Gentiles were ever regarded as “ God worshippers”: only Jews or Jewish Proselytes.
Plato’s “ Apology” ( Trial of Socrates) distinctly, when speaking of and as Hermes, equates the daemonic deity with the incarnate “ word/logos/speech/reason”. The heathen “ most high daemon/deity” found itself incarnate, and walking among men ( at least in the minds of the heathen nations) in the form of Hermes/Mercury/Odin. Hermes, like Cadmus who gave letters to the Greeks, and like Thoth to the Egyptians, was a Phoenician ( or more accurately a Tyrian) daemonic deity. The original name in Phoenician was “ Hiram”..The Rosicrucian Theosopher William Wynn Wescott unequivocally confirms that the THIRD Hermes ( Hermes Trismegistus) was no other than the Hiram Abiff of the Bible, whom Masonry worships as Hermes Trismegistos ( see Manly Palmer Hall’s work to this effect also).

Hiram Abiff, referred to Biblically as the evil apostate of the tribe of Dan ( see Jeremiah’s references to the line of Antichrist coming from Dan) was known universally ( and Biblically) as the “ Prince of Tyrus” due to his renowned worldly wisdom. It is from his tradition and lineage (“ knowing dark sentences”) that the Antichrist is to come. Hiram Abiff was known in Scandinavia as ODIN, and it is a historical fact that all the “ Royal Houses” of Europe claim descent from ODIN, who established a Phoenician colony
in Denmark.
None of the Philosophers of the heathen nations were free of “ the gods”; not even their most popular “rebel against the rule of the gods”: Socrates; the tutor of Plato. Though holding out against the charge of “ unbelief ” by a final sacrificial act in his very last moments, even Socrates finally succumbed and revealed the true nature of his allegiance by offering sacrifice to Asclepius; the “ crooked serpent” ( satan) of the Bible. This so-called “pious act” has been repeated by countless “ pagano-Christians”, particularly since the time of the Renaissance, who have foolishly embraced the Socratic tradition by imitating the sacrifice of Socrates to Asclepius: the demon of the Rosicrucian/ Medical Fraternity, and thereby forefeiting their souls. Asclepius has NOTHING in common with the brazen serpent tradition of Moses, as the great Christian Apologist, Justyn Martyr, affirmed over eighteen centuries ago.

Had Socrates finally in his dying moments sacrificed to Aesclepius out of mere “jest” he could never have maintained his reputation posthumously as a philosopher, nor could he have sacrificed as a hypocrite, despite being an unbelieving heathen as were all the Philosophers of the Gentiles. Asclepius, the “ crooked serpent” ( Satan) of Scripture, was the daemon of the medical profession, and remains so to this day.

Christ and the Cross remain and remained a complete mystery to the Gentiles, and none of them were ever referred to as “ God Worshippers” unless they became true Proselytes to Judaism. This, especially, was true of ALL the Gentile/Heathen Philosophers, including Pythagoras, Heraclitus, Socrates, Aristotle and Plato.

When Paul and Barnabas were accosted by the locals at Lystra on one of their Missionary Journeys, as recorded by Luke in the Book of Acts of the Apostles ( Acts 14: 8-18), the locals attempted to offer Sacrifice to Paul and Barnabas precisely because they expected the arrival and incarnation of the false Prophet ( Jupiter/Zeus/Thor) AND the Antichrist ( Mercury/Hermes/Odin) in light of the miraculous work the Apostles had done which, in the minds of the Lystrians, was a qualification and requisite of the future “ world saviours” of the revived Golden Age of Saturn. The Lystrians, as with all mystery religions of the heathen nations, expected the incarnation of Jupiter and Mercury at the future time of the Age of Saturn/Chronos ( the “Moloch” of the Jews); the new “ Golden Age” of the world.

…..And if we assert that the Word of God was born of God in a peculiar manner, different from ordinary generation, let this, as said above, be no extraordinary thing to you, who say that Mercury is the angelic word of God. (Justin Martyr. First Apology Ch: 22)
And when he [the devil] brings forward Æsculapius as the raiser of the dead and healer of all diseases, may I not say that in this matter likewise he has imitated the prophecies about Christ? ( Justin Martyr. Dialogue with Trypho Chapter 59)…..

“A martyr faithful unto death at Pergamos (Rev 2:13). “I know … where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is” (the idol AEsculapius was worshipped there under the serpent form); “and thou holdest fast My name, and hast not denied My faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was My faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth.” Satan, the old serpent, instigated the idol’s devotees, through the magistrates at Pergamos, to slay Antipas. Compare Rev 2:10; Rev 12:1-17.”
(Fausett’s Bible Dictionary article on “Antipas”)

The following excerpts which illustrate the erroneous beliefs of the heathen Philosophers regarding the doctrine of the “ logos” , with some refutations of such errors by the early Christian Fathers and Apologists, particularly against the heathen notions of the logos being an “ angelic” or a “generated/created” INTERMEDIARY entity and spirit, ( namely the demon HERMES) are referenced by the Internet link immediately below:


The Logos of Philo is an intermediary: “The Father who engendered all has given to the Logos the signal privilege of being an intermediary (methorios) between the creature and the creator . . . it is neither without beginning (agenetos) as is God, nor begotten (genetos) as you are [mankind], but intermediate (mesos) between these two extremes “(Quis rer. divin. haeres sit, 205-06). The Word of St. John is not an intermediary, but a Mediator; He is not intermediate between the two natures, Divine and human, but He unites them in His Person; it could not be said of Him, as of the Logos of Philo, that He is neither agenetos nor genetos, for He is at the same time one and the other, not inasmuch as He is the Word, but as the Incarnate Word (St. Ignatius, “Ad Ephes.”, vii, 2).

It is in Heraclitus that the theory of the Logos appears for the first time, and it is doubtless for this reason that, first among the Greek philosophers. For him the Logos, which he seems to identify with fire, is that universal principle which animates and rules the world. This conception could only find place in a materialistic monism. The philosophers of the fifth and fourth centuries before Christ were dualists, and conceived of God as transcendent, so that neither in Plato (whatever may have been said on the subject) nor in Aristotle do we find the theory of the Logos.

It reappears in the writings of the Stoics, and it is especially by them that this theory is developed. God, according to them, “did not make the world as an artisan does his work, but it is by wholly penetrating all matter that He is the demiurge of the universe” (Galen, “De qual. incorp.” in “Fr. Stoic.”, ed. von Arnim, II, 6); He penetrates the world “as honey does the honeycomb” (Tertullian, “Adv. Hermogenem”, 44), this God so intimately mingled with the world is fire or ignited air; inasmuch as He is the principle controlling the universe, He is called Logos; and inasmuch as He IS the germ from which all else develops, He is called the seminal Logos (logos spermatikos). This Logos is at the same time a force and a law, an irresistible force which bears along the entire world and all creatures to a common end, an inevitable and holy law from which nothing can withdraw itself, and which every reasonable man should follow willingly (Cleanthus, “Hymn to Zeus” in “Fr. Stoic.” I, 527-cf. 537). Conformably to their exegetical habits, the Stoics made of the different gods personifications of the Logos, e.g. of Zeus and above all of Hermes. At Alexandria, Hermes was identified with Thoth, the god of Hermopolis, known later as the great Hermes, “Hermes Trismegistus”, and represented as the revealer of all letters and all religion. Simultaneously, the Logos theory conformed to the current Neoplatonistic dualism in Alexandria: the Logos is not conceived of as nature or immanent necessity, but as an intermediary agent by which the transcendent God governs the world. This conception appears in Plutarch, especially in his “Isis and Osiris”; from an early date in the first century of the Christian era, it influenced profoundly the Jewish philosopher Philo…..

…..In Stoicism, as it developed after the 4th century BC, the Logos is conceived as a rational divine power that orders and directs the universe; it is identified with God, nature, and fate. The Logos is “present everywhere” and seems to be understood as both a divine mind and at least a semiphysical force, acting through space and time. Within the cosmic order determined by the Logos are individual centers of potentiality, vitality, and growth. These are “seeds” of the Logos (logoi spermatikoi). Through the faculty of reason, all human beings (but not any other animals) share in the divine reason. Stoic ethics stress the rule “Follow where Reason [Logos] leads”; one must therefore resist the influence of the passions-love, hate, fear, pain, and pleasure…..

….Heraclitus was the earliest Greek thinker to make logos a central concept. He urges us to pay attention to the logos, which “governs all things” and yet is also something we “encounter every day.” We should probably emphasize the linguistic connections of logos when interpreting Heraclitus’s thought. In our efforts to understand the world, we should look to our language and the order embodied in it, rather than to scientific or religious views that neglect this….

…..In the 3d century BC the proponents of Stoicism borrowed the idea of logos from Heraclitus (neither Plato nor Aristotle had given the term prominence) and used it for the immanent ordering principle of the universe – represented, at the level of language, by humankind’s ordered discourse. Nature and logos are often treated as one and the same; but logos is nature’s overall rational structure, and not all natural creatures have logos, or reason, within them. Humans are urged to “live consistently with logos.”…..
Clearly, the above notions concerning the pagan ” logos” are in complete opposition with the ” dabar” of the Old Testament Hebrews, and the ” logos” of the New Testament Christians. The exhortations by the Philosophers to ” live consistently with logos” is far from any Christian of truly Jewish concept to that effect. ” The Word ( Dabar, Logos) became Flesh” is true of only one historical Incarnation; that of Jesus Christ, whereas the Philosophers sought a cyclic Incarnation of Hermes/Mercury/Odin ( the Spirit of the Antichrist) as their counterfeit ” mirific word/logos” false world savior. Christ Jesus is THE only ” mediator between God and Man”, but certainly not an ” intermediatory angelic being or psychopomp” as the heathen philosophers taught of the daemon Hermes/Mercury/Odin. There is no other name given under Heaven by which we may be saved, except the name of Christ Jesus…


    • Dear Ernest Johnson Udom…. Thank you kindly for your interest in Early Church Revival…. Some of the articles I have printed in the past, such as As It Was In The Days Of Noah etc… I do not have access to a suitable commercial printer at the moment but would be happy to supply you with material in the future once I can get everything organised. We are hoping also to form a Christian Community in the future, but at this stage it has not been realised… I am happy for you to communicate directly by email with me on earlychurchrevivalmovement@gmail.com. That way we can more readily discuss printed material, Christian Community etc.etc. Look forward to your email… Kind Regards and Maranatha…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s